Discussion of Financial Results

Review of Operations

Vintage is fundamental to the business as it determines the quality and quantity of wine available for future sales in all markets. 

Grape Intake – The Company sources 98% of the grapes from the independent growers with the balance being harvested from the Company’s own vineyards.  The resultant wine from the “own use” is used for sale under the Peter Lehmann brand, for sale in bulk to other wineries and under buyers’ own brand labels. 

Contract Crushing – Work is actively sought from other wineries as a means of securing overhead recoveries.  The harvesting times for grape growing districts and grape varieties differ and this allows PLW to spread the crushing activities over the vintage period.

Vintage - Tonnes

Year 

  Crushed - Own Use

  Crushed Contract

Total Crushed     

1994

6,493

5,410

11,903

1995

4,991

5,031

10,022

1996

8,326

5,876

14,202

1997

7,309

5,211

12,520

1998

7,608

6,261

13,869

1999

7,760

6,422

14,182

2000

5,991

4,923

10,914

2001

10,157

5,214

15,371

2002

11,561

5,509

17,070

2003

9,506

4,796

14,302

2004

14,588

4,360

18,948

2005

17,308

3,771

21,079

2006

13,643

3,752

17,395

2007

8,021

3,634

11,655

2008

14,150

3,991

18,141

2009

10,992

3,837

14,829

PLW Vineyards

The Company has three vineyards located in the Barossa Valley and a fourth located in the Clare Valley.  Having vineyards under its own control provides PLW winemakers with flexibility in securing fruit grown under specific viticulture management regimes.  The area planted is given in the table below.

Vineyard Hectares

Year

Hectares Planted

Year

Hectares Planted

1994

-

2002

71

1995

18

2003

71

1996

18

2004

41

1997

36

2005

41

1998

36

2006

41

1999

57

2007

41

2000

57

2008

41

2001

57

2009

41

Sales Revenue

PLW continually monitors stock holdings and aligns these with bottled wine sales and forecasts.  Wine identified as being surplus to requirements is made available for sale on the spot market which has been affected by the general slowdown in Australian wine sales.  Export sales accounted for 73% (2008: 52%) of sales volume.

Sales Revenue by Volume

Year

Bottled - Domestic

Bottled - UK

Bottled - Export excl UK

Bulk - Current Vintage

Bulk - Prior Vintages

Total Revenue by Vol

1994

16%

15%

4%

44%

21%

100%

1995

15%

17%

4%

37%

27%

100%

1996

15%

18%

5%

44%

18%

100%

1997

16%

21%

4%

36%

23%

100%

1998

21%

33%

5%

27%

14%

100%

1999

27%

34%

6%

21%

12%

100%

2000

36%

33%

11%

8%

12%

100%

2001

33%

32%

17%

8%

10%

100%

2002

37%

28%

17%

10%

8%

100%

2003

43%

24%

22%

8%

3%

100%

2004

37%

25%

26%

7%

5%

100%

2005

37%

26%

25%

4%

8%

100%

2006

32%

27%

29%

5%

7%

100%

2007

28%

20%

28%

2%

22%

100%

2008

29%

19%

33%

6%

13%

100%

2009

33%

16%

38%

7%

6%

100%

Sales Revenue by Dollars

Year

Bottled - Domestic

Bottled - UK

Bottled - Export excl UK

Bulk - Current Vintage

Bulk - Prior Vintages

Contract Services

Sales Revenue $000's

1994

32%

26%

6%

24%

12%

0%

12,979

1995

31%

33%

7%

18%

11%

0%

13,662

1996

31%

27%

7%

22%

8%

5%

17,167

1997

31%

30%

8%

16%

11%

4%

22,113

1998

32%

43%

7%

10%

5%

3%

31,243

1999

39%

39%

9%

7%

3%

3%

35,146

2000

46%

31%

16%

2%

3%

2%

36,406

2001

38%

31%

24%

2%

2%

3%

41,696

2002

41%

27%

25%

3%

2%

2%

44,762

2003

43%

23%

29%

2%

1%

2%

46,091

2004

38%

23%

33%

2%

2%

2%

51,250

2005

37%

24%

32%

1%

4%

2%

55,543

2006

34%

24%

37%

1%

3%

1%

57,592

2007

31%

21%

39%

1%

7%

1%

63,487

2008

33%

11%

45%

3%

6%

2%

61,999

2009

34%

8%

51%

2%

3%

2%

52,598

Branded domestic sales were down 20% in volume and 16% in value compared with the previous year.   Although the decline in sales is predominantly attributable to lower sales of the Peter Lehmann Semillon, this decline appears to have slowed.

In the UK, sales volume has fallen over that of the previous year due to a strong downturn in sales to the supermarkets, although volumes in the restaurant, hotel and club segment increased by 50% which was very heartening.

Various countries in continental Europe have collectively become the Company’s largest export market with sales volumes mirroring domestic sales volume.  Although the volume to the USA market was lower, the favourable exchange rate boosted sales revenue compared with the previous corresponding period.  Sales to the Canadian market remained approximately at the same level as the previous year in both volume and value terms.
 
Bulk wine sales slowed considerably compared with the previous year as the Australian wine industry is an oversupply position.  

The Barossa district is highly regarded as a world class producer of top quality fruit and PLW has sufficient volumes of high quality wine available which will greatly assist in meeting future sales aspirations.   The outlook for the national 2010 vintage is quite uncertain as the industry faces difficult decisions regarding the required structural change to bring supply back into balance with demand.

Profitability

Management is cognisant of the need to balance volume growth aspirations with profitability targets.  Funds for advertising and promotional support provided to gain access to retail shelf space are monitored carefully to avoid the trap of pursuing profitless volume.

Although the Group is fully cognisant of the need to carefully monitor inventory levels the imports of NZ Sauvignon Blanc has severely destabilised the white wine market and resulted in an oversupply situation.  Although the Company continues to explore avenues to sell white wine stocks it made the prudent decision to make a provision for write-down of $992,000 for this inventory.

The reporting of certain assets and liabilities at fair value at reporting date introduced more volatility into the measurement of profit.  This principle applies to biological assets - grape vines and their crops, as well as financial derivatives such as interest rate swaps and forward exchange contracts.  

A measure of trading profitability EBIT expressed as a percentage of sales.  The outcome is determined by the mix of revenue activities and their respective margins as well as PLW’s ability to contain costs and expenses.  The 2004 EBIT % has been calculated exclusive of the takeover costs in order to compare the performance with prior years.


Year

EBIT as % of Sales Revenue

Year

EBIT as % of Sales Revenue

1994

17%

2002

24%

1995

16%

2003

20%

1996

19%

2004

19%

1997

20%

2005

20%

1998

18%

2006

19%

1999

21%

2007

16%

2000

23%

2008

24%

2001

23%

2009

19%

After tax profit and earnings per share are other indicators of profitability.  The 2004 result was affected adversely by the takeover costs.

Year

After Tax Profit $000's

Basic Earnings per Share cents

No of Shares at Balance Date 000's

1994

1,352

7.1c

18,930

1995

1,296

6.8c

18,930

1996

1,807

9.4c

19,170

1997

2,589

11.9c

25,371

1998

3,464

12.2c

30,946

1999

4,475

13.9c

33,235

2000

5,009

15.1c

33,260

2001

6,195

18.1c

34,147

2002

6,915

19.0c

36,359

2003

5,419

14.5c

37,311

2004

3,830

10.1c

37,969

2005

6,317

16.6c

37,969

2006

5,748

15.1c

37,969

2007

5,975

15.7c

37,969

2008

9,604

25.3c

37,969

2009

5,736

15.1c

37,969

Another measure of profitability is the return on shareholders’ equity. This is measured as the after tax profit (ATP) expressed as a percentage of shareholders’ equity. The 2004 return on shareholders’ equity was affected by the takeover costs.

Return on Equity

Year

ATP as a % of Equity

Year

ATP as a % of Equity

1994

14%

2002

16%

1995

13%

2003

11%

1996

16%

2004

7%

1997

17%

2005

12%

1998

17%

2006

10%

1999

16%

2007

10%

2000

17%

2008

14%

2001

18%

2009

9%

Review of Financial Condition

Capital Investment and Structure

Contributed equity remained constant at $30.6M with the use of debt facilities increasing from $16.1M at 30 June 2008 to $20.1M at 30 June 2009. 

At 30 June 2009 gearing (interest bearing debt as a percentage of capital employed) was 30% (2008: 24%).  Interest cover (the number of times operating profit before interest and tax is greater than the total interest charge) moved to 6 times, from 15.2 times last year.  This rate is comfortably ahead of the financial covenant level.

The nature of the industry requires the maturation of red and fortified wines beyond a 12 month period.  The lower 2009 grape crop volume has offset the slowdown in sales and as a result the value of inventory holdings at 30 June 2009 of $49.8 is 1% higher than the 2008 level of $49.2M.  The Group is aware of the need to balance the volumes of wines held for future sales.

Capital projects and working capital requirements have been funded by funds generated by operating activities.  The relocation of the southern tankfarm to alongside the winery complex has almost been completed at an estimated total cost of $1.2M.  The relocation is expected to improve productivity, reduce the use of water required to clean the wine lines and reduce electricity currently required to pump wine between the two separate locations.

Company tax for the Group of $2.5M at an effective rate of 30% has been provided on the operating profit before tax and compares with the company tax rate of 30%. 

The Company has declared a final dividend of 4.8 cents and combined with the interim dividend of 3.5 cents totals 8.3 cents per share.  It is in keeping with the board’s policy of dividends moving broadly in line with underlying earnings per share.